Klamath Falls City Councilman Greg Taylor Arrested on Sex Abuse Charge

Klamath Falls City Councilman Greg Taylor was arrested Wednesday and accused of sexually abusing a 4 year old boy.

Greg Taylor was booked into the Klamath County Jail and charged with first-degree sex abuse. He was released later that afternoon after posting 10% of a $100,000 bond.

According to Klamath County District Attorney Ed Caleb, he was notified last week by the Lane County District Attorney that they were investigating Councilman Taylor following a report of an incident that occurred March 27th while Taylor was visiting family in Corvallis.

According to Caleb, he was told the report said Councilman Taylor was alone with his 4 year old God Son when adults in another room heard the 4 year old yell, “let go of my penis”.

Caleb told Klamath Online that the family called the police and reported the incident immediately. According to Caleb, Councilman Taylor sent a letter to the family after returning to Klamath Falls from his visit, where he neither admitted, nor denied the incident.

This afternoon investigators from the State Police, after questioning Councilman Taylor about the incident, placed him under arrest charging him with first-degree sex abuse.

Councilman Taylor informed Klamath Online that he is in the process of hiring an Attorney to defend him in this case, and that he will plead not guilty.

Klamath Online will keep you informed about the case as information is made available.

So Let Me Tell You Who To Vote For May 15th

In my humble opinion copy

Elections have consequences so the importance of knowing
which candidate to vote for cannot be understated. Whether national, state, or
local elections, we must act as responsible hiring decision makers, set aside
whatever personal feelings we have (good and bad), look deeply into the
background of those running and hire the people most qualified, not most
likeable. We must make objective hiring decisions for all of these positions,
or accept blame when someone we voted for, without properly vetting the person,
performs poorly in the position we voted them into. Likeability should only
play a role when we have 2 equally qualified individuals.

Below is a list of online links where you can view local
candidate debates and forums. I understand that it takes commitment and time to
review all of them, but keep in mind, the people you hire (vote for) May 15th
will be in office for 4 years. Investing the time to review as many of these
video links as possible before you cast your votes, could save us all 4 years
of misery if we elect the wrong people to serve as our Chief Executives,
because we did not spend the time to interview, or vet them fully.

I hope this resource is a useful tool in assisting you with the
very important task of hiring the right people to serve us all.

Klamath County Assessor Debate held January 19th:
http://www.viddler.com/v/d36e1069

Klamath County Sherriff Debate held February 8th
(does not include Brian Bryson as he filed after the debate was held): http://www.viddler.com/v/e9c65a30

Klamath County Commissioner Position 3 Debate held February 15th:
http://www.viddler.com/v/bfd87a50

Klamath County Commissioner Position 1 Debate held March 7th:
http://www.viddler.com/v/a97acadc

Republican Party Debate for Commissioner Position 1 held March 8th:
http://www.viddler.com/v/1f65fb2b

Republican Women’s Forum with all candidates held April 2nd:
http://www.viddler.com/v/716d0fe3

State Senate District 28 Debate held April 11th: http://www.viddler.com/v/629f6ef7

League Of Women Voters forum with all candidates except state legislature
candidates held April 17th: http://www.viddler.com/v/5fad09d

Meeting Participants Respond To Cheryl Hukill

GUEST COLUMN

From: Paul Stewart, Dr. Rick
Zwartverwer, Bill Guest

We believe Cheryl Hukill grossly misrepresented the meeting
to which she referred in Tuesday’s meeting of the Klamath County Board of
Commissioners. We consider her statements to be not only incorrect, but also
insulting and an affront to our honor and integrity.

A contingent representing local medical services did indeed
visit Mrs. Hukill, as well as the other commissioners in separate meetings. The
purpose of those meetings was to seek a collaborative conversation that would
help move us forward with a local model for local healthcare in the form of a
Klamath Falls-based Coordinated Care Organization to best respond the demands
of healthcare reform.

It is our belief that CCC (Cascade Comprehensive Care), with
a 16 year history of successfully managing medical care for Medicaid enrollees,
is the best option for that model. It has the structure that provides the ideal
platform to support the physical and mental health of the people in our
community. CCC is locally owned and
operated and employs 23 individuals. It
does not make sense in this economy to ship these jobs outside of our
county. CCC also enjoys widespread support from local medical providers.

Our goal is and has always been to create an atmosphere of
cooperation with local physical and mental health professionals so we can
provide the best care we can for the local community. And that requires a
constructive conversation so we can work together to improve health.

CCC has asked that the county engage in discussions as the
local mental health authority regarding a non-binding memorandum of
understanding, following the process outlined by the state. CCC has also asked the county to help
identify the members of a “selection committee” who will help populate an OHA
mandated “Community Advisory Council”.
These steps are intended to build collaboration.

No letter of support was “demanded”. No threats were made to smear Commissioner
Hukill or any of the Commissioners if they did not support CCC.

Mrs. Hukill further misrepresents the process by suggesting
candidates for political office have been somehow influenced to “sell” the
local solution to the county commissioners. CCC has never in its 16-year
history contributed to a local city or county political candidate or campaign.

She should know that the decision will be made by the Oregon
Health Authority in Salem, not here.

Commissioner Hukill’s comments do not place us on a
constructive path, and do not help achieve a community-based solution. We
believe our way – the way of cooperation and collaboration – is the better way.

The decision to work in collaboration on the CCO should be
simple since it helps the people we all serve.

Cheryl Hukill; “I Do Not Cave In To Threats”

Cheryl Hukill Guest Commentary copy

The Klamath County Board of Commissioners has the
responsibility of making a recommendation to the state of Oregon in support of
the organizations(s) we feel will best serve the most vulnerable Klamath
citizens, and manages the MEDICAID revenue in a manner that will provide
delivery of healthcare services to the most vulnerable of our population which
totals more than 13,000 individuals. Four Organizations have filed a
letter of intent with the Oregon Health Authority indicating that they will
apply to receive a CCO contract. One of the organizations that have
submitted a Letter of Intent is a local organization called Cascade
Comprehensive Care, or CCC. Their initial Letter of Intent only specified
2 zip codes as their desired service area, 97601 and 97603. Prior to me
becoming aware of this, there was no indication that they would not be seeking
to serve all of Klamath County. Their original Letter of Intent is the
reason I recently announced that I would likely support a different organization
to be the countywide CCO, during a discussion I was involved with at the
Gilchrist CAT meeting. As I stated at the time, I was elected to serve
the entire county, and CCC was seeking to serve only 2 zip codes. Since
making that announcement, I have learned that CCC has filed an amended LOI to
include a larger area of Klamath County, but are still not seeking to serve all
of Klamath County.

Unfortunately, this issue has become very political with
candidates running for office acting as the salesmen for CCC. I have not
heard any of these candidates state that they have studied the other 3
organizations LOI’s to see their qualifications, assess their coverage area, or
evaluate their experience. As a county commissioner, it is very prudent
to look at all applications of organizations competing, whether for a CCO, a
bid, a job application, or any other RFP before making a decision.

Most disturbing to me is a meeting that was held in my
office the 2nd week of March where 3 owners of CCC demanded a letter of support;
telling me that they had to have it by the end of the month. No other
applicant made that demand. I told them that I knew that letter was not
required at that time. That I could not make that decision that we would
have to wait until we saw what other organizations would be applying and that
the final decision would be made by the entire Board of Commissioners. I
was told that if I did not give CCC the support, I would not want to see the
headlines in the Herald and News! I do NOT cave in to threats,
manipulation, or pressure; nor will practice closed doors secret politics,” in
making my decision. I will NOT be bought for political favors. If
CCC chooses to make good on their threat and use the Herald and News to try and
destroy my political career and public service as a Commissioner because I
would not choose them without a thorough analysis, then I will walk away with
my head held high, my integrity and values intact, and knowing that I have
served the citizens of Klamath County well.

I am fully aware that they have deep pockets and influence
to launch a very expensive campaign against me, if I do not vote for
them. But I will not surrender my obligations to look out for the
healthcare needs of the most vulnerable in our community to a group of wealthy
people just to win an election campaign. Fortunately here in America,
those decisions are still made by We The People.

Had I surrendered to their demands at that time, we would
have handed them a letter of support not knowing that they had only intended to
provide these vital services to 2 out of 20 Klamath County zip codes.
Holding firm to my values and responsibilities instead of succumbing to
pressure prevented us from potentially making a huge mistake.

We have scheduled a meeting on Tuesday the 24th of April, to
meet with representatives from all 4 organizations, so that we can ask
questions in order to determine who we will recommend for a letter of
support. Then, on Wednesday the 25th, we will make our decision.

Cheryl Hukill

Klamath County Commissioner, Position 3

FOUR ORGANIZATIONS SUBMIT LETTER OF INTENT TO APPLY TO BE A CCO IN KLAMATH COUNTY

Crater Lake with county outline copy

CCOs are local health entities
that will deliver health care and coverage for people eligible for the Oregon
Health Plan (Medicaid), including those also covered by Medicare. CCOs must be
accountable for health outcomes of the population they serve. They will have
one budget that grows at a fixed rate for mental, physical and ultimately
dental care. CCOs will bring forward new models of care that are
patient-centered and team-focused. They will have flexibility within the budget
to deliver defined outcomes. They will be governed by a partnership among
health care providers, community members, and stakeholders in the health
systems that have financial responsibility and risk.

Today,
services such as mental and physical health care are usually offered
separately, in fragmented and uncoordinated ways, so that members have gaps in
their care. Providers are paid for treating illness, not for preventing
it. Members with chronic conditions don’t get services that will keep
them healthy and help them avoid unnecessary hospitalizations or emergency
care.

The
potential cost savings for Oregon are substantial — more than $3 billion over
the next five years — and will ensure that our most vulnerable citizens
maintain coverage
– Oregon Health Authority

Organizations that intend to apply to
become a Coordinated
Care Organization (CCO) were required to submit a
letter of intent by April 2nd. Among other information these
organizations had to disclose, was the service area the organization intends to
cover if their application is approved. If the organization intends to serve an
entire county or counties, they could simply name the county(s). If they do not
intend to serve the entire county, they were asked to use the zip codes of the
area(s) they were going to serve if their application was approved.

Klamath Online examined each of the
50 Letters Of Intent (LOI) submitted by organizations indicating an interest in
applying to become CCO’s, to determine
how many are seeking to be a CCO for Klamath County. Of the 50, we identified 4
organizations relevant to Klamath County. Two of these identified the entire
county as their service area, and two other organizations listed specific zip
codes within Klamath County as their desired service area.

You can click on the links to view their individual LOI’s.

The two organizations that specified
zip codes as their desired service area are:

1.
Cascade Comprehensive Care; based in
Klamath Falls, OR. CLICK HERE

The Klamath County service area identified
in their LOI specifies zip codes 97601 and

97603
as their desired service area. Both are Klamath Falls area zip codes.

2.
PacificSource; headquartered in
Springfield, OR. CLICK HERE

The Klamath County service area
identified in their LOI specifies zip codes 97731,

97733, 97737, 97739 as their desired service
area. Areas covered by these zip codes are:

97731
Chemult; 97733 Crescent; 97737 Gilchrist; 97739 La Pine

The
following zip codes are not listed as desired service areas in either LOI from the
organizations that used zip codes to specify their desired service area:

97425 Crescent Lake

97602 Klamath Falls

97604 Crater Lake

97621 Beatty

97622 Bly

97623 Bonanza

97624 Chiloquin

97625 Dairy

97626 Fort Klamath

97627 Keno

97632 Malin

97633 Merrill

97634 Midland

97639 Sprague River

The two organizations that identified all of Klamath County,
among other counties, as their desired service area are:

1.
Greater Oregon Behavioral Health Inc.
(GOBHI); headquartered in The Dalles, OR.

CLICK HERE

GOBHI
has specified 18 whole counties, Klamath County included, as their desired
service area, as well as zip codes to identify additional service areas within Douglas County.

2.
UnitedHealthcare; headquartered in Tigard,
OR. CLICK HERE

UnitedHealthcare has specified 30 whole counties, Klamath County
included, as their

desired service
area.

During the remainder of this year, there will be 4 waves of
applications accepted from organizations seeking to become CCO’s. The timeline
for the first wave is:

Deadline: Non-binding Letter of Intent of CCO Application due to OHA:
April 2, 2012

Deadline: Technical Application from CCO applicants due to OHA: April 30, 2012

Deadline: Financial Application from CCO applicants due to OHA: May 14, 2012

New Coordinated Care Organizations certified: May 28, 2012

Medicaid Contract(s) signed by new CCOs by June 29, 2012

Medicaid Contract to CMS for approval by July 3, 2012

Medicaid
Contract Effective for new CCOs: Aug. 1, 2012

This will
impact the Healthcare of every Klamath County citizen receiving MEDICAID/MEDICARE,
which currently totals approximately $56 million in Healthcare services.

Facts About The New Oregon Health System And CCO’s

healthcare image

Coordinated
Care Organizations

March 2012 fact sheet – Oregon Health
Authority

A more
person-centered and affordable health system for Oregon

Coordinated
Care Organization definition

A Coordinated Care
Organization (CCO) is a network of all types of health care providers who have
agreed to work together in their local communities for people who receive
health care coverage under the Oregon Health Plan (Medicaid).

What will
stay the same and what will be different with Coordinated Care Organizations

Under CCOs, the Oregon
Health Plan’s medical benefits will not change. But today the system separates
physical, behavioral and other types of care. That makes things more difficult
for patients and providers and more expensive for the state. CCOs will have the
flexibility to support new models of care that are patient-centered and team-focused,
and reduce health disparities. CCOs will be able to better coordinate services and
also focus on prevention, chronic illness management and person-centered care.
They will

have flexibility within
their budget to provide services alongside today’s OHP medical benefits with
the goal of meeting the Triple Aim of better health, better care and lower
costs for the population they serve.

How
Coordinated Care Organizations will work

CCOs will be local. They
will have one budget that grows at a fixed rate for mental, physical and
ultimately dental care. CCOs will be accountable for health outcomes of the
population they serve. They will be governed by a partnership among health care
providers, community members, and stakeholders in the health systems that have
financial responsibility and risk.

Status of
Coordinated Care Organizations

Across the state, care
providers, hospitals and health care plans are coming together to apply to
become Coordinated Care Organizations. The first CCOs should be launched by
August 1, 2012. There will be four open application periods for CCOs in 2012.

Key
milestones

April 2, 2012 Non-binding
letters of intent due to OHA from all potential 2012 CCO

applicants (no matter when
they intend to apply through the year)

April 30, 2012 Technical
applications due to OHA from potential CCOs for first period

May 14, 2012 Financial
applications due to OHA from potential CCOs for first period

May 28, 2012 First CCOs
certified and enter CMS approval process

Aug. 1, 2012 First CCOs
launched

Seewww.health.oregon.gov
for timelines for subsequent application periods.

How CCOs
will be chosen

The request for
applications (RFA) lays out detailed criteria for potential CCOs. The RFA can be
found atwww.health.oregon.gov. The Oregon Health Authority is
responsible for selecting local CCOs. Potential CCOs will be measured on their
ability to:

·Develop
and implement alternative payment methodologies that are based on the Triple Aim
of improving health, health care and lowering costs;

·Coordinate
the delivery of physical health care, mental health and chemical dependency services,
and oral health care;

·Engage
community members and health care providers in improving the health of the

community and addressing
regional, cultural, socioeconomic and racial disparities in

health care that exist
among the OHP clients/CCO members and in the CCO’s

community;

·Progress
from the baseline requirements for CCOs to the full requirements expected at maturity;

·Manage
financial risk, establish financial reserves and meet minimum financial

requirements; and

·Operate
within a fixed global budget.

Public
process in creating CCOs

The request for
applications requires each CCO applicant to hold a public information session in
its local community. Additionally, all non-binding letters of intent and
technical applications from potential CCOs will be posted online atwww.health.oregon.gov.

Information
for Oregon Health Plan clients

OHP clients will be
notified at least 30 days in advance of any change in health plans, but the Oregon
Health Authority will be going above and beyond standard notices. Special
outreach and communications will be created for Oregon Health Plan clients
about CCOs, what to expect with the coming change and how to use CCOs for
better health and care.

Background
on how CCOs were created

CCOs were created in
response to escalating health care costs, due in large part to an

inefficient health care
system. Over two legislative sessions, in 2011 and 2012, Governor Kitzhaber and
bi-partisan lawmakers passed landmark legislation. More than 1,200 Oregonians
provided input through eight community meetings that were held around the
state, and another nearly 200 people met in work groups to help create the
framework for CCOs.

Reducing
costs while improving care

A third-party analysis
found that by implementing CCOs, Oregon could save a significant portion of
projected Medicaid costs in the short and long terms. Savings in state and
federal dollars would be more than $1 billion within three years and more than
$3.1 billion over the next five years.

STARTING THIS MONTH, 20,000 MORE OREGONIANS CAN ACCESS FREE HEALTH CARE

OHA

Beginning this month, 20,000 more Oregonians will be able
to receive life-saving breast and cervical cancer screenings, health care, and
birth control services through a statewide network of providers which includes
Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon (PPSO).

Beginning April 2, 2012, the state Medicaid family planning program
(C-Care) expanded eligibility to cover adults and teens up to 250% of the
federal poverty level, a significant increase from the previous rate of 185% of
the federal poverty level. This means
that to qualify for the program, the monthly household income for a family of
four is now $4,803, up from $3,554.

C-Care covers free birth control, annual exams, breast
and cervical cancer screenings, and other reproductive health services that are
essential for the health of women and families throughout Oregon. “We want women and families to know that
expert health care is available to them at no cost. Anyone interested in getting free birth
control, annual exams, and other health services can call Planned Parenthood of
Southwestern Oregon for more information,” says Cynthia Pappas, CEO of
Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon.

Currently approximately 100,000 people are served by
Oregon’s C-Care program each year. The
change in eligibility requirements will allow 20,000 more Oregonians to receive
family planning services annually.

“Making this program more accessible will have a
dramatic impact on the health of Oregonians.
It will reduce unintended pregnancies, save money, and improve the
health and lives of Oregonians,” says Ms. Pappas. While unintended pregnancy rates have dropped
significantly in the United States between 1994 and 2001, it actually rose
nearly 25% for women living at or below 200% of the federal poverty level.

“Expanding the C-Care eligibility will help
thousands of Oregonians get the health care they need in these tough economic
times,” says Ms Pappas. Along with
providing health care to people who couldn’t otherwise afford it, the C-Care
program saves the state millions of dollars.
Between 1999 and 2008, over 845,000 people used the C-Care program. Data
from Oregon Management Reports shows that the program has saved the State of
Oregon an estimated $330 million in Medicaid expenditures.

Please CLICK HERE for
current income guidelines for C-Care eligibility.

HOSPITAL FRONT-LINE CARE PROGRAM SHOWING POSITIVE RESULTS

Hospitals 4 Health

A front-line care program currently being implemented in
a number of hospitals around the state is showing positive results, according
to a recent survey of health care staff.

The program, “Transforming Care at the
Bedside,” or TCAB, empowers front-line health care workers to take the
lead in implementing changes that result in better care. The survey shows a 10
percent increase in better access to supplies and equipment to better perform
their work; a 12 percent improvement in communication among peers; and a 16
percent increase in those who expressed, “my ideas seem to count.”

TCAB is a four-pronged approach, that includes safe and
reliable care; vitality and teamwork; patient-centered care; and value-added
care processing. The survey measured vitality and teamwork, and the results
were shared at a TCAB conference hosted by OAHHS in March. To see more results
from the survey, go online http://www.hospitals4health.org
search TCAB.

ABOUT OAHHS:

Founded in 1934, the Oregon Association of Hospitals and
Health Systems (OAHHS) is a statewide, nonprofit trade association that works
closely with local and national government leaders, business and citizen
coalitions, and other professional health care organizations to enhance and
promote community health and to continue improving Oregon’s innovative health
care industry.

ABOUT HRET:

Founded in 1944, the Health Research & Educational
Trust (HRET) is the not-for-profit research and education affiliate of the
American Hospital Association (AHA). HRETs mission is to transform health care
through research and education. HRETs applied research seeks to create new
knowledge, tools, and assistance in improving the delivery of health care by
providers in the communities they serve. For more information about HRET, visit
www.hret.org.

MALLAMS IS NOT QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS A COMMISSIONER

Letter to the Editor 1 copy

In Tom Mallams letter to the Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar,
Mallams whined that at a public meeting, he was very intimidated by a petite
Grandmother and was prevented from entering and taking a seat by her (read
H&N 11/04/2011). At least 20 eyewitnesses & myself agree
this is a total fabrication by Mallams. Everyone, including Mallams, was seated
for the entire meeting, enjoying his freedom of speech and the Grandmother’s cookies
that she baked and brought for all.
Mallams demonstrates by this example that he lacks managerial skills and
honesty needed to be commissioner.

In recent environmental impact
scoping meetings, Mallams accused the panel of Scientists of “being liars,
that their work was junk, with the outcome all ready determined before work was
started”. Mallams is accusing the
Scientists from his perspective of a high school education. This exemplifies that Mallams is unable to
accept testimony if it doesn’t fit his agenda.

One of the reasons Mallams opposed the KBRA is the fact that
KOPWUA, which he is president, has unsuccessfully sued PacifiCorp(and it’s
ratepayers, indirectly)for more than $86,000,000 regarding a 1956 expired
contract( H&N 10/01/2010),to subsidize off-project irrigators.

KOPWUA, represented by Mallams, is the group that insisted
during KBRA negotiations that the irrigators be subsidized with $250,000,000
from taxpayers. Very poor negotiating strategy,
and a total lack of fiscal responsibility on Mallams part. Also there is no transparency of funds
donated or paid out of Mallams organization.

The recent release of the proposed order of the water
adjudication, which didn’t turn out as Mallams had wanted, the advice Mallams
gave to junior water right holders was ” your water right is not worth the
paper to start your fire with”(H&N12/04/2011).

Mallams offers no solutions to Basin
problems. We’ve only gotten from Mallams
is negative fear mongering. The evidence
is clear; Mallams is not qualified to serve as a Commissioner.

By Matt Walter

OSP SEEKING PUBLIC’S HELP TO IDENTIFY 3 SUSPECTS IN MONDAY MORNING ASSAULT ALONG HIGHWAY 62 NORTH OF EAGLE POINT

OSP

Oregon State Police (OSP) is asking for the public’s help
to identify three male subjects who reportedly assaulted and robbed a Shady
Cove man along Highway 62 north of Eagle Point early Monday morning.

On April 2, 2012 at approximately 1:30 a.m., a 28
year-old man was traveling northbound on Highway 62 when his vehicle was
overtaken by an older “Jeep style” vehicle. After the driver of the
suspect vehicle repeatedly pulled in front of the victim’s vehicle and slowed
down, the victim pulled to the side of the road near the Butte Falls Highway
cut-off at milepost 14.

The suspect vehicle stopped near the victim’s vehicle and
three unidentified adult males got out and confronted the victim. As an
altercation ensued, the three male suspects reportedly assaulted the victim and
robbed him of an undisclosed amount of cash. The victim was later transported
by a family member to a local hospital where he was treated for multiple
fractures and released.

The three unidentified suspects are described as being in
their mid 20′s to early 30′s. Suspect #1 is approximately 6′ 3″ tall with
a large build. Suspect #2 is approximately 6′ 5″ tall with a thin build.
Suspect #3 was only described as being average height and weight. As a result of the altercation, the three
suspects may have bruises or injuries to their faces or necks.

The suspect vehicle was described as dark maroon or dark
purple, older model SUV, possibly a Jeep.
The vehicle has oxidized paint, most notably around the doors and side
windows, and displayed an Oregon license plate that may begin with the number
“2″.

OSP Criminal Investigation Division is seeking
information that will assist in identifying the three suspects involved in this
incident. Anyone with information should contact Detective Bryan Scott at (541)
618-7957 or Sergeant Jeff Fitzgerald at (541) 618-7952.

Klamath County Showed No Illicit Drug-Related Deaths According to Statewide Report

Medical

Oregon State Medical Examiner Dr. Karen Gunson released
2011 drug-related death statistics reflecting an alarming increase from last
year and the highest number of total deaths since the beginning of 2000. The newly released statistics show an
increase in all four categories tracked by the State Medical Examiner’s office.

“The sharp rise in illicit drug deaths in just one
year is alarming. Of great concern is the rise in heroin deaths, probably
indicating an increase in the availability of the drug,” said Gunson.

Drug-related death statistics released for 2011 shows a
20 percent increase — 240 total drug-related deaths, up from 200 deaths in
2010 – in Oregon from the use of Heroin, Cocaine, Methamphetamine, or a
combination use of those drugs. Statewide prescription drug overdose deaths
were close to the number of deaths during the previous year.

A review of the 240 illicit drug-related deaths and their
frequency of use in those deaths in 2011 reflected:

* Heroin was the leading cause of death with 143 deaths;
a 59 percent increase and the highest number of recorded deaths for this
category since the start of 2000. The second highest number of heroin-related
deaths (131) occurred in 2000.

* Cocaine-related deaths saw the highest percentage
increase (63%) for the year but were the third lowest total number since 2000.
Thirty-three (33) deaths in 2011 were cocaine-related, up from 20 deaths in
2010. The highest number of cocaine-related deaths (69) occurred in 2000.

* Methamphetamine-related deaths increased by one death
compared to 2010, but were still the highest number for this category since the
start of 2000. The 107 deaths last year nearly doubled the 56 deaths recorded
in 2000.

* Combination of drug use deaths jumped 115 percent in
2011 with 39 deaths. The previous years’ 18 deaths were the lowest for this
category since the start of 2000.

Total drug-related deaths in Multnomah County increased
37 percent from 87 in 2010 to 119 in 2011. All four categories noted increases,
led by heroin-related deaths jumping 63 percent and combination drug use nearly
tripled. Other counties with notable increases in total drug-related deaths
included:

* Clackamas County increased 50% from 10 (2010) to 15
(2011)

* Lane County increased 43% from 16 (2010) to 23 (2011)
— Of note, heroin-related deaths jumped from 2 to 15

* Jackson County increased 200 % from 3 (2010) to 9
(2011) — Of note, methamphetamine-related deaths jumped from 2 to 8

Some counties noting a drop in total drug-related deaths:

* Marion County decreased from 12 (2010) to 10 (2011)

* Klamath County showed no illicit drug-related deaths,
down from 6 recorded for 2010

Statewide prescription drug overdose deaths from
Methadone use again topped the list of major prescription drugs with 100
confirmed deaths in 2011; a drop from 101 deaths in 2010 and a 23 percent drop from
2008 when 131 deaths were recorded. Fifty-six (56) deaths from Oxycodone
overdose were recorded in 2011, down from 59 deaths in 2010 and up from 39
deaths in 2008. The third highest major prescription drug category,
Hydrocodone, noted 37 overdose deaths in 2011, up from 30 deaths in 2010 (no
2008 comparable numbers available for this release).

“The unacceptable level of the number of
prescription drug deaths remained steady. We must continue to educate patients
on the safe use of these medications and continue to warn those who abuse these
drugs of how dangerous and fatal misuse may be,” said Gunson.

Note that prescription drug overdose deaths statistics
are statewide and are not included with the information provided on the State
Medical Examiner’s website.

Information for all counties with at least one
drug-related death and a comparison of drug-related death categories during the
last 11 years is available through the State Medical Examiner’s 2010
statistical review at http://www.oregon.gov/OSP/SME/index.shtml.

Powered by WordPress